 Arctic Boundary Issues, CAFF vs. AMAP |
( Log In ) Log In is for TREC Teachers & Researchers only
TREC Virtual Base Camp > Climate Studies: Svalbard, Norway > Ask the Teacher (Bob) or the Scientist Team  |
| Brandon Boldt |
  May 25 2005, 10:03 PM
Post
#1
|
|
Unregistered  |
Hey Mr. Oddo, I have just begun one of your online experiments that incoporates IMAGE-J Software to look at changes in Arctic ice cap area from February to August in the years 1998 to 2003. From the background information you have provided I understand the differences in the definition of Arctic boundaries that the AMAP and CAFF model provide, however, I wonder which model is more widely accpeted. In addition to the model that is most widely accepted, what model will you be using with your first hand experiments, the CAFF - based on Arctic Flora, or the AMAP which is a model that compromises the borders of many accepted models. Thank your for your help in answering this question!
Sincerely, Brandon Boldt |
 
|
|
| Robert_Oddo |
May 26 2005, 02:05 AM
Post
#2
|
 TREC Teacher  Group: TREC Team Posts: 165 Joined: 27-April 05 Member No.: 8 |
Brandon,
Again really good question. I think that it isn't really which definition is more accepted. I think it is a matter of the context in which you are studying the Arctic. I will have to look into this question a little more and get back to you. Thanks, Mr. Oddo |
   |
|
 |
1 User(s) are reading this topic (1 Guests and 0 Anonymous Users)
0 Members:
|
NSF Acknowledgment & Disclaimer | Time is now: 17th July 2025 - 11:58 AM |
Invision Power Board
v2.1.7 © 2025 IPS, Inc.