IPB

( Log In ) Log In is for TREC Teachers & Researchers only

 
Reply to this topicStart new topic
> Increasing Discharge
Brooke
post May 31 2005, 03:19 PM
Post #1


Unregistered









Has the MacKenzie and Yukon Rivers' discharge increased 50-100 years?
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
Max_Holmes
post Jun 21 2005, 10:16 AM
Post #2


TREC Researcher
**

Group: TREC Team
Posts: 22
Joined: 23-May 05
Member No.: 17



Hi Brooke,

That's a great question. Unfortunately, I can't answer it. The reason I can't answer it is because the USGS (United States Geological Survey) did not start measuring Yukon River discharge near the ocean until the mid 1970's, and the Canadians didn't begin to measure the Mackenzie River discharge until about the same time. In contrast, the Soviet Union (now Russia) started measuring the discharge of their arctic rivers in the 1930's. And in order to know if discharge is changing over time, we need long records for analysis.

Amazingly, the United States government will soon stop measuring discharge of the Yukon River (at Pilot Station, the station closest to the ocean), because they don't have enough money (remember, the US is probably the richest country on Earth). But Russia, where the economy is MUCH worse, continues to measure discharge for all of their big arctic rivers. I congratulate the Russian Federation for their priorities in this case and question the current priorities of the U.S. government.

Thanks for the excellent question. I'm sorry that the data do not exist to answer it.

Max
User is offlineProfile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post

Fast ReplyReply to this topicStart new topic
2 User(s) are reading this topic (2 Guests and 0 Anonymous Users)
0 Members:

 



- NSF Acknowledgment & Disclaimer Time is now: 18th April 2024 - 04:10 AM